-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cilliizzzza for the lose again.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Objectivity means giving all sides a fair hearing. It does not mean drawing a false moral equivalence. In this case there is no one-hand-or-the other. And anyone who seeks to hide under that calumny is not just a liar, but an accessory, in this case to genocide. -Amanpour, CNN
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@CillizzaCNN does not suffer from self-awareness. -
I concur for two reasons 1) it's a correct assessment 2) disagreeing with myself scares people
-
Only when I argue out loud
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The second tweet isn't even necessary. The obvious rooting for sides is so obvious it hurts. "No spin" unbiased mainstream journalism is and has been dead for a while now.
-
I agree , spend a day watching nothing but Fox .
-
I also agree. Fox is as biased and askewed as all the rest. When I said "mainstream", I make no exceptions.
-
Fox Claim not to be the Mainstream. Also "as all the rest" ? Every other media outlet when faced with evidence will change their story to fit it , except fox ... calling unarmed Palestinians protesters "terrorists" for example. Narrative over truth at Fox at any cost.
-
Unarmed Palestinians? You mean the guys with fire bombs, flaming swastika kites, flaming tires, slingshots, and a couple explosive devices? Right... those poor, poor helpless protesters. They're luck the IDF showed restraint and only killed 40 instead of all of them.
-
Who provided how much of a real threat ?
-
That doesn't matter. It's Israel's border. They're lucky of the 60 killed, 50 were Hamas members. Israel could of wiped out the entire protest, they didn't. Also, "unarmed" is inaccurate, because they were, regardless of whether you think the arms they had were sufficient or not.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's ok for the media to have bias. It's not ok to lie about it.
-
This. Their pretense to objectivity is the problem. At least the early newspapers wore their bias on their sleeves and didn’t insult readers - although they insulted most everyone else
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Please make sure the secret service sees this. Looks like an obvious threat against the President to me
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Jesus, dude, that's not a rifle's cross hairs. I hate defending Cillizza, but seriously:https://twitter.com/CillizzaCNN/status/996454269493575682 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
