Evidence and facts are two totally different things. Statements made under the penalty are not facts. You should really stop weighing in on legal issues if your political agenda is going to get to your head that badly.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If we follow your logic, then the claims made by Ford are not facts either, and we're left with no credible allegation, as there is no corroboration. If her allegations are to be believed on their existence alone, then so are the boyfriend's, and she lied. That's the hypocrisy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
he contacted the committee, not a media outlet, didn't seek out attention...Fraud lied regardless because she has done research involving polygraphs
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Actually presumption of innocence only applies to the accused. Evidence impugning the plaintiff is exculpatory for the defendant. In other words there is no charge for the plaintiff to be innocent of if that makes sense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sorry, one side changed the rules and now accusations are facts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
her evidence doesn't exist...it's she said he said...she has NO evidence.. NONE . CAN'T count her polygraph because she won't reveal it for scrutiny, you can't count her therapist records, she won't produce them so they might not say anything she says they do. SHE HAS ZERO PROOF.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would say
#CoryBooker was hypocritical. Ex boyfriend's testimony would be relevant. Especially since http://Dr.Ford had no clue on polygraphs. Which we know now is a lie!#MAGA#ConfirmKavanaughNOWThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
New normal: accusation is good enough. That’s what we learned the last 2 weeks. We didn’t start this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just throwing them in the pile next to hers. Neither has proof at this point = cancel each other out?
#ConfirmKavenaughNowThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But what about the new rules?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Guilty until she can prove her innocence. That is the new standard for public trials.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're absolutely right. I have no problem saying that someone is lying here. I even have no problem noting that Rachel Mitchell appears, in hindsight, to have been asking questions about just this. But none of those things is remotely dispositive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As much as I think this women's story is total bullshit I have to agree with Caleb here....us believing the ex without proof just because he signed sworn statement would be hypocritical. ..but it has changed to a she said (ford)/he said,he said,he said,she said,he said
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nope that high road was destroyed by the left.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe it's a tactic to expose the hypocrisy, though? I agree 100% with you, but can we not call those people out saying this who don't follow the same standards for Ford?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But these are new rules now. We are only approaching this from blue lenses
-
No, the blue lenses defy all logic. It doesn’t matter what other evidence exists, she must be right because “we want her to be, we need her to be!!!”
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.