That wouldn't change a thing, it's about destroying ANYONE who is nominated, to delay the vote as long as possible in hopes of winning midterms to destroy any Repub. chances of nominating anyone to #SCOTUS
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That would be a ridiculous and harmful concession to these kinds of smear tactics. What possible good would come of signalling that this is an acceptable way to block a nominee you don't like?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
lol if you think dems won't do the same thing to her.
-
Hint: they would.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nope. Its abt more than Kavanaugh now. It’s about due process & not allowing a precedent. Stop being a pussy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, Barrett would be a far better SCOTUS justice. On the other hand, I'm worried about the precedent set by shutting down a nomination over allegations this flimsy.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No! This is bigger than Kavsnaugh now...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What is Amy’s stance on gun rights? I like BK bc of his DC rulings on gun rights. I know nothing about Amy’s views on them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is absurd. Caving now would be an unmitigated disaster for Republicans.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do what thing? Start a discussion of the dangers of Christian cults in America? Because that's what you're going to get.
-
What's your source? Why single out Christian "cults"? Islam is a much bigger threat to America.
-
I'm not saying I think that's right, I'm saying that's what the Dems will do. Look at Barrett's Wikipedia page under "Religion." You know full well they'll take her "small tight knit sect" and paint her as a crazy zealot. And Christianity is fair game for abuse.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do you think that
#Kavanagh will even go through with the rest of the process? I don’t know that he will. This Mitchell Prosecutor is useless. Are these Democratic Senators accusing the President of the United States of a “cover-up??” Are there any repercussions for slander??Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. I refuse to let them win based on a smear campaign. Normal, SANE, common sensed Americans see this for what it is. I was willing to give her the benefit of the doubt, but there are too many inconsistencies, too many "I can't recalls" from just last month. No evidence
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. They already have her accusers/letters lined up. Every person on Trump’s list. It will not end.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You’re dreaming. If Kavanaugh is a leader of a rape train gang, can you imagine what they’ll accuse the more conservative Barrett of?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I really wanted to see ACB in RBG's seat.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dude what is wrong with guys like you? It's his constitutional right to defend himself and face his accuser. Uncorroborated, unsubstantiated allegations should not be able to ruin a man's life. Stop being a hysteric.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.