FBI has declined to investigate, so case closed. Let’s move on.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Credibly accused sexual assailant Donald Trump putting credibly accused sexual assailant Brett Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court tells you everything you need to know about the Republican Party
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Comrade - you forgot to respond in Russian - how’s the weather in Russia this time of year?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
One article said that she couldn't remember what year this happened, how the party had been organized nor how she got home. Seems like others at the party should come forward and at least confirm they were all there if this is to be taken seriously.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What $$$ did she finally sell out for?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe that Sen Feinstein has more power than Judge Kavanaugh and could have walked this woman through the hearing if she actually believed her allegations
-
How about she didn't just wait 2 months to make it an obvious character assassination? If she truly believed this asinine letter why didn't she advocate immediately? ("immediately" 30 years late, for a party she can't name the year or location it even occured at)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And HOW long has Kavanaugh been a Judge and she has remained silent? It's time to put a STOP to the Democrats games. They make ALL women look bad.
#VoteREDToSaveAmericaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Attempting to ruin a decent man's life, DiFi is taking things to a new low
-
Decent men don't get credibly accused of sexual assault or lie under oath...
-
Credibility? How can you tell someone is lying? The story is STATIC. Truth is fluid. The whole thing was contrived. Everything was ready to roll out on schedule. VOTE on Thursday
-
The truth doesn't follow a schedule. It may have been disingenuous for the Democrats to introduce this so late in the process, but it doesn't change the fact that the sexual allegations are credible.
-
She doesn't remember names in 2002. Now they come to her? She was at the party. Under age drinking? Alone? 2 guys? Apparently she said no & nothing more happened. Why was she in counseling w/husband? Convenient blame? Too many questions? No repeated acts?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed, but how's that any different (or worse) than the GOP standing behind Kavanaugh when they knew this was part of his record?
-
Because she had direct knowledge of an alleged crime.
-
The GOP knew... though she had a deeper knowledge for sure. However, didn't she also have a responsibility to the victim?
-
How TF did the GOP have knowledge of a secret letter of a secret allegation by a secret plaintiff that was held in the closet of a Dem senator (who had a Chinese spy on her staff for over a decade)? The Chinese government was supposed to leak it to the GOP?
-
How TF did the GOP get 65 signatures in the hours after a secret letter of a secret allegation by a secret plaintiff that was held in the closet became known? It's because they already knew about it Chris...
-
That's what happens when you're actually a good person. People stand up to insane character assassination. And the literal answer? The telephone and internet. This isn't 1918.
-
Actually good people don't dismiss sexual allegations out of hand... and I'm not talking about Kavanaugh.
-
They're called cowards. Anyone who doesn't stand up to categorically false, uncorroborated, decades old 'memories'. Cowards. This is stasi shit.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.