(1/3)going thru @cabledrummer work I noticed there are some serious flaws: @espressonline and @SMaurizi NEVER released a @wikileaks cable
-
-
Replying to @SMaurizi
@SMaurizi@espressonline@wikileaks Sorry, no flaws, the data are accurate. Please see http://tl.gd/k5o2d213 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Cabledrummer
@Cabledrummer so@espressonline NEVER EVERcensored@wikileaks 09VATICAN106, we CAN'T accept such serious accusations based on a flawed work1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cabledrummer
@Cabledrummer Listen:this work is a serious one,U can't afford sloppy procedures/analysis if U want 2expose media which censored@wikileaks1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SMaurizi
Dear
@SMaurizi "This does not necessarily mean that this organization made the redactions." clarifies everything, pls. http://www.cabledrum.net/msm/2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @crowdleaks
@crowdleaks Don't you think that putting in the same box /journos who heavily redacted cables and those who never did is deeply wrong?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@SMaurizi @crowdleaks Agreed. But: we didn't do that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.