(1/3)going thru @cabledrummer work I noticed there are some serious flaws: @espressonline and @SMaurizi NEVER released a @wikileaks cable
-
-
Replying to @SMaurizi
@SMaurizi@espressonline@wikileaks Sorry, no flaws, the data are accurate. Please see http://tl.gd/k5o2d213 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Cabledrummer
(10/10)
@Cabledrummer thus 09VATICAN106 ended up in@espressonline @repubblicait common database, BUT we NEVER REDACTED it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SMaurizi
@SMaurizi@espressonline @repubblicait I didn't claim anything else. Our database doesn't distinguish between "published" and "re-published"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cabledrummer
@Cabledrummer And that's a serious flaw! You should! If you don't distinguish who redacted what, your work is just defamation1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cabledrummer
@Cabledrummer Listen, if you want I am ready to help you to make sense of data, but things must to be done rigorously, not in this way1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.