(1/3)going thru @cabledrummer work I noticed there are some serious flaws: @espressonline and @SMaurizi NEVER released a @wikileaks cable
-
-
Replying to @SMaurizi
@SMaurizi@espressonline@wikileaks Sorry, no flaws, the data are accurate. Please see http://tl.gd/k5o2d213 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Cabledrummer
(1/10)
@Cabledrummer@espressonline Listen: the OFFICIAL@wikileaks database for cables is http://www.cablegatesearch.net do you know this?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SMaurizi
@SMaurizi@espressonline http://cablegatesearch.net shows exactly the same data as http://cabledrum.net . Btw it's not the "official" database3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cabledrummer
@Cabledrummer the cable 02ROME3796 released by@wikileaks is the VERY same released by@espressonline1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SMaurizi
@SMaurizi@espressonline No. Once again: Faulty WikiLeaks release in this case. ONLY official WikiLeaks release is http://wikileaks.org/cable/2002/08/02ROME3796.html …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Cabledrummer
@Cabledrummer Didn't you notice that TWO different cables had been put together? http://wikileaks.org/cable/2002/08/02ROME3796.html …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.