(1/3)going thru @cabledrummer work I noticed there are some serious flaws: @espressonline and @SMaurizi NEVER released a @wikileaks cable
-
-
(1/10)
@Cabledrummer@espressonline Listen: the OFFICIAL@wikileaks database for cables is http://www.cablegatesearch.net do you know this? -
@SMaurizi@espressonline http://cablegatesearch.net shows exactly the same data as http://cabledrum.net . Btw it's not the "official" database -
@Cabledrummer Look at what you published as the 02ROME3796 cable released by@wikileaks http://www.cabledrum.net/cables/02ROME3796 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
(2/10)
@Cabledrummer so, if you check the OFFICIAL@wikileaks database,U can see w/ your eyes that cable 02ROME3796 is: http://www.cablegatesearch.net/search.php?q=02ROME3796&qo=0&qc=0&qto=2010-02-28 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(3/10)
@Cabledrummer and if U check the official@espressonline database you can see w/ your eyes that 02ROME3796 is: http://racconta.espresso.repubblica.it/espresso-wikileaks-database-italia/dettaglio.php?id=71 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(4/10)
@Cabledrummer check the 02ROME3796@wikileaks cable released by@espressonline in its English version http://racconta.espresso.repubblica.it/espresso-wikileaks-database-italia/dettaglio.php?id=71 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(5/10)
@Cabledrummer so, can you see that@wikileaks release 02ROME3796 and@espressonline release of 02ROME3796 are IDENTICAL?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(6/10)
@Cabledrummer so how can you sustain that@espressonline cut huge chunks of cables? THAT'S FALSE!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(7/10)
@Cabledrummer journos who worked CONSCIENTIOUSLY on cables and never dared 2censor a single line CANNOT accept this SERIOUS FLAWSThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(8/10)
@Cabledrummer the same applies to the Vatican cables:@espressonline NEVER EVER released@wikileaks cable 09VATICAN106Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(9/10)
@Cabledrummer 09VATICAN106 was released by the Guardian HEAVILY REDACTED, @repubblicait just put it in its repositoryThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(10/10)
@Cabledrummer thus 09VATICAN106 ended up in@espressonline @repubblicait common database, BUT we NEVER REDACTED it -
@SMaurizi@espressonline @repubblicait I didn't claim anything else. Our database doesn't distinguish between "published" and "re-published" -
@Cabledrummer And that's a serious flaw! You should! If you don't distinguish who redacted what, your work is just defamation -
@SMaurizi Until today, people see censored cables on your website. They don't ask who censored it. -
@Cabledrummer Listen, if you want I am ready to help you to make sense of data, but things must to be done rigorously, not in this way -
@SMaurizi If you want to discuss it in detail, please follow for DM
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Cabledrummer you can easily check that 09VATICAN106 was HEAVILY REDACTED by the Guardian and released 21Dec2010 http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/230036 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Cabledrummer so@espressonline NEVER EVERcensored@wikileaks 09VATICAN106, we CAN'T accept such serious accusations based on a flawed work -
@SMaurizi Fact: You've *published* the censored cable 09VATICAN106 on your website (which doesn't mean that you've censored it) -
@Cabledrummer Listen:this work is a serious one,U can't afford sloppy procedures/analysis if U want 2expose media which censored@wikileaks -
Dear
@SMaurizi "This does not necessarily mean that this organization made the redactions." clarifies everything, pls. http://www.cabledrum.net/msm/ -
@crowdleaks Don't you think that putting in the same box /journos who heavily redacted cables and those who never did is deeply wrong? -
@SMaurizi@crowdleaks Agreed. But: we didn't do that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.