Appreciate the feedback! And the fact that the conference did allow for one of my fav european perspectives on lunch:pic.twitter.com/KfJDY1CeAx
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
Appreciate the feedback! And the fact that the conference did allow for one of my fav european perspectives on lunch:pic.twitter.com/KfJDY1CeAx
As @a_b_powell pointed out today, this conference ‘doesn’t count’ for social scientists yet. The question I bring away from this year is how that process of making this kind of translation count can be done.
It certainly doesn't count for ( most) lawyers. But then I'd say no conference truely counts for us - what matters is outputs and to some extent, they can be anywhere. So I observe some of these culture wars with a little bemusement,..
Yes, indeed, it felt like a bunch of the same folks came to sit in a hotel in a different place rather than try to expand range of actors. Also look at the sponsors...
Please raise this up during the comment/suggestion section
I’m not skilled enough verbally to say these eloquently.
The work the FAT originators have done to connect law to CS has taken a decade - if we do this for a decade we’ll have a more representative chunk of the SSH communities
Seems to me that the name “FAccT” reveals even more prejudices than “FAT” did!
From the perspective of one of the shepherds of the conference process this year, I’d agree it could be much more diverse. But the task was to attract submissions from relevant people totally new to FAT, and that doesn’t happen in a single year’s process.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.