#Froome & Sky attacking the credibility of salbutamol testing is not at all surprising. A malfunctioning kidney defense may still be needed (his value is that high), but chipping away at the foundations is predictable. Here’s a thread on it, from earlier:https://twitter.com/Scienceofsport/status/993413989890707457 …
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
Two other striking things about the paper: 1. The title: “Futility of current urine salbutamol doping control”. I’m all for impactful headings & titles, but a paper using a theoretical model based on dogs hasn’t earned the right to say “futility”. Sensational agenda, though
2 odpowiedzi 3 podane dalej 23 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
2. Many are assuming this is a paid for study by Sky/Froome. The Conflict of Interest statement does not mention any funding or commission. The timing is perfect though. See also the publication history. Rapid. Would love to know if communication preceded it, or future assurancespic.twitter.com/NfNtpQjueU
4 odpowiedzi 4 podane dalej 13 polubionychPokaż ten wątek
Somewhat questionable whether there was sufficient time for proper peer-review in such a short time and for such a delicate topic.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.