Perfect example to explain why we need #systematicreviews & not narrative reviews! The author isn't even a mask expert! Narrative reviews can be biased by selecting the evidence that supports the hypothesis of authors, ignoring quality & other evidence!https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8?fbclid=IwAR3OJHss9MsOINcegBj8NIUWyf9GlDHBBc_1njkOL0_SV_-gGb58hJImBTs …
-
Right, but I think the point was on the Nature article itself as "meta–meta-analysis".
It’s a news feature from a science journalist. I think such pieces are incredibly important for science communication.
