I agree that your earlier study was important in estimating R0, but isn't it too much to say you got k~0.5 from your study when 90% range is 0.014–6.95? I guess you could get a different median with a different prior.
Great new study about superspreading of #SARSCoV2 confirming our results from in @Eurosurveillanc from January that the dispersion parameter k ~ 0.5 is higher compared to SARS, MERS and Ebola (where k ~ 0.1 - 0.2) but lower than for influenza (where k ~ 1) https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.4.2000058 …https://twitter.com/msy_lau/status/1296579558062383105 …
-
-
-
I was referring to medians or point estimates (same for other infections). That’s why these additional studies are so important to better understand how much overdispersion we can truly expect from
#SARSCoV2 and by what factors it is influenced. - Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.