Like I've said, I'm pretty sure the ubiquity of systemd was bootstrapped by intelligence agency astroturfing & manip https://twitter.com/munin/status/739852690163793921 …
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Never attribute to malice what is...
"The intentionality of an agent with behavior sufficiently indistinguishable from malice, is irrelevant." (JJ's razor > Hanlon's 
.) @cr1901
-
-
"Greater than"... by what metric? :P
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
literally just made this same point in conversation ~30 mins ago
-
now you know what to call it
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
longwinded debate over whether google/apple's behaviour was malice or incompetence. only answer: who cares?
-
precisely. In such cases, intentionality is only relevant to the agent
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Interesting! A malicious agent with bad intentions could be called evil. On the other hand, a malicious agent with good intentions might be reasoned out of their current maladaptive frame of mind.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
"People, including family, will hurt you, either intentionally because they're malicious, or unintentionally because they're incompetent." — Said a man who died unhappy.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Similar energy to “Do not bother to examine a folly. Only ask what it accomplishes”
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
WHY IS THIS STILL TRENDING AND WHY DO I STILL SEE IT EVEN AFTER MUTING IT?!
-
1. Because it's a really good phrasing of a very important principle (and it's very relevant right now
).
2. Because Twitter blows goats. 
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.