Because there’s a set of copyrights to protect the writers of songs for the lyrics/melody that they've created, you can receive a claim if you sing a song a cappella (regardless of the quality of your vocals--although, tbh, we were impressed). More info: http://goo.gl/ESkbsb
-
-
It's not youtube it's the music industry.
4 replies 1 retweet 82 likes -
Replying to @KlebYT @OmarSebali and
Its youtube supporting the music industry more than creators
3 replies 1 retweet 250 likes -
Replying to @mtz_federico @KlebYT and
By law, YouTube has to cooperate. Copywrite issues are beyond YouTube’s control.
2 replies 1 retweet 91 likes -
Replying to @OmarSebali @disssgraceful and
Article 17 in the EU is gonna make it even worse, unfortunately. Music industry is pretty ruthless I hear.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
-
Replying to @ephelps_ @OmarSebali and
Actually it was changed to Article 17, so that's what it's being called now.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CSdaWolf @OmarSebali and
Hate to break it to you but it’s still Article 13
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
"Crucially, the rules approved in Strasbourg include what was Article 13 – and was renumbered to Article 17 – that makes platforms liable for potential copyright infringement on content uploaded to their sites." - from Variety. Also @PhillyD mentioned the same change.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.