Our founders weren't infallible. They debated but failed to include term limits. They gave us COS as a means to correct such errors.
D.C. lobbyists hate the idea of term limits. What say YOU? http://www.conventionofstates.com pic.twitter.com/WjXP37PlFC
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can we give lobbyists a little respect here? They work so damn hard, day in and day out, to feed our leaders money to bribe their influence into law. It’s such hard work! Cut em some slack! Ethics is just fake news anyway.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i hate being the party pooper, but term limits just mean the Administrative State has a firm grip on day to day running of the nation. If they screw up, promote their retirement. it is called BEING INVOLVED. We have to get OUR hands dirty to do this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Founder's didn't include term limits because the average life span was at most 65. Same reason social security could start at 62. Gov't banked on people not living long enough to collect.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m in favour of anything lobbiests hate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Term limits and make it illegal to take money and bribes and none of these people would even want the job.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The longer a law maker is in office the less they need to depend on lobbyists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.