@nebrius @sarahmei
@KimCrayton1 Hi all, We have reviewed social and videos and determined that the Event Code of Conduct was violated and his registration to the event has been revoked. Our events should and will be a safe space:https://events.linuxfoundation.org/about/code-of-conduct/ …
-
-
Replying to @linuxfoundation @nebrius and
Could you please link to or screenshot the offending content for those of us that can't find it?
3 replies 1 retweet 19 likes -
Replying to @solderjs @linuxfoundation and
"Twitter, Diversity and Being Nice"https://youtu.be/GXlckshcJwk
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @codenmath @linuxfoundation and
So after 35 minutes I got: * (backstory) some people were bickering * 200 characters isn't enough for a civil conversation * lack of communication is harmful * let's not be violent, let's not be bullies * let's be tolerant, listen, and communicate What's wrong?
2 replies 1 retweet 25 likes -
Replying to @solderjs @codenmath and
The problem is it greatly downplays John's tweets which were angry, racist, and sexist. Then goes on to call for civility from those John attacked. Saying they shouldn't be angry and calling them uncivil, which is the very definition of tone policing.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @kurtiskemple @codenmath and
(1/3) Chuck is, by profession, a journalist. It's how he pays the bills. In the video he starts off with "a lot of stuff has been deleted, this is hard to follow, I don't know the full story, I want to open a conversation". Journalism is about gathering information FIRST.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @solderjs @kurtiskemple and
(2/3) It sounds like you're parroting what others have said. I watched the whole video last night. Not once did Chuck say how people should *feel*. He did offer some suggestions as to how to *act* - which apply equally well to all involved, and he definitely calls out John.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @solderjs @kurtiskemple and
(3/3) John's a jerk. He has no trouble admitting to that. He doesn't delete his tweets to cover his tracks or to make people look bad. So... where is this racist or sexist material? Everyone's calling him a racist... but what did he say? No one will link to ANYTHING he said!!1
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @solderjs @kurtiskemple and
I'm confused why you took the time to scour Kim's timeline, but not John's, the person who is the subject of this conversation? You do realize that by prioritizing finding something to make Kim look bad, instead of having an actual reason to defend John, you look questionable?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
The only things that were deleted were the origin of what was said by Aimee and Jamon. They aren't needed to understand that what John said was abusive, and much of it was racist and sexist. He's also made racist comments on his facebook, and he makes misogynistic videos.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
| she/her 