Coercive Control

> here who support one or all of these) need highlighting and exposing for what they do, why they do it, what they hope to achieve and why they need to be stopped.

> of accountability in the non regulated area of the domestic abuse sector and THAT is not good. The tactics displayed by Eve Thomas and Barbara Hewson and the anon accounts Brookeporkpies and MajorLeak2017 ( who Eve confirmed was Simon Just) as well as several other accounts on>

> that because of the public ending of our *affair* people who I had never spoken to came out of the woodwork to tell me of their experiences of Eve and it was shocking. To date there are 48 people who I have spoken with and their experiences highlight a deeply disturbing lack>

> grave doubts over her service resulted in me refusing to feature her in an online publication I produce. That opened up a WHOLE can of worms and Eve even told Barbara that I refused to give information to the police.. The important thing in the saga that is All About Eve is >

> but, hey, nothing stood in the way of this campaigner’s ambition to make a mark on the abuse sector landscape. Nothing. Not even the fact that her ex husband did not set fire to her and was not imprisoned for it. When Eve and I parted ways -long story but in a nutshell >

> apparently Eve’s ex had set her in fire, burnt her eyebrows off and breached several restraining orders so went back to prison. Eve liked to make out she was at high risk of domestic homicide yet was really putting herself out there on SM which I found perplexing.>

> she made herself out to be this expert who employed ex police and a human rights barrister. She also told me that her life was in danger and if her ex found her and her children, he would kill them all. She started this campaign for #EvesLaw because of her experiences in court>

On to Exhibit 2: Eve Thomas. Eve is now on blacked- out- super-deep-dark-lock down. Before that Eve had a service called SAFE that actually wasn’t. How did I know about this? Grab a biscuit and make yourself comfortable- it’s going to be good. I met Eve on Twitter. >

> Your days of bullying and intimidating and humiliating and shaming and taunting and mocking and disparaging and defaming are numbered so enjoy it whilst you can you sad sad sad horror of an individual.>

> so, Barbara Hewson is supposedly trying to sue me for defamation. Hysterical as nothing I have said is as bad as what has already been published in the national press!!!! Barbara, listen up, love, you want to repair your online reputation? Stop being such a malicious dick! >

and whinged about *alleged* victims crying victimhood, yet she CONTINUALLY whinges & whines about people abusing HER whilst she is SIMULTANEOUSLY annihilating others!!!!!! I wanted the University and, in fact ANY establishment I hold an event with/for to see what she is like>

> Sarah Phillimore and myself ( as well as others including the journalists who have written about her online antics) of trying to defame her, trying to ruin her career ( as what? A ubiquitous online *troll*?) and of causing distress to her. She has whined & whined & whinged >

> I could have ignored it; I could have gone on the attack instead, I choose Plan B. I sent the link of every national newspaper that had featured Barbara as an online *troll* as well as the judgment for her failed Judicial Review of a PIN. Why? Because Barbara is accusing >

> and that was VERY APPARENT recently when I held a conference on #coercivecontrol in Bristol. On the eve of the conference, Barbara emailed several people at the university to make some pretty wild accusations and unreasonable demands which were designed to intimidate.>

> it is a self help manual. Why do I say that? Because for all of Barbara’s nasty outpourings on social media which she claims is free speech which she has a right to, she can not take what she gives out. Barbara cuts like a knife yet bruises like an old peach. >

> she will attack the DPP and the CPS and talk in disparaging tones of the *cult of I believe* and refer it to the men allegedly falsely accused of rape or sexual abuse of either children or adults. Barbara has also written on the compensations of victimhood. I strongly suspect>

> rape or child sexual abuse are innocent before proven guilty. If it’s a VICTIM saying that, Barbara will burst a blood vessel to attack It is ALLEGED victim It is a FALSE ALLEGATION They are a FANTASIST They are part of the NUTTERBUS They are CONSPIRALOONS They are FAKERS

> has a thing against IICSA- the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse. For some reason I can not fathom, she does not want it to go ahead. > campaigns against false allegations but makes plenty of her own- go figure...... > appears to only believe that those accused of>