-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If this happened under Obama, you would be weeping and worshiping at his feet. Right?
-
Obama’s average over 75 months of growth was 199,000 jobs per month - the projection for last month was 192,000, and they missed that by 24,000.
-
The real question is why you weren’t worshipping at his feet, but are seemingly impressed by this lackluster under-performance.
-
It’s because we’re already at “full employment.” Of course job growth would be at a slower rate.
-
You'd think this part would be obvious
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The reason why the unemployment rate is at 3.9% is that a lot of people have lost their unemployment benefits, and no longer count. The low jobs creation number is a telltale sign that the economy stinks. Me - 16 and counting. Been underemployed twice as long as my last job.
-
That sucks, I can't keep up with the job offers I receive. Guess it's a personal thing.
-
Who are you - Donald Trump?
-
Lol, who are you - Hillary Clinton?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Is this why my IRA and 401(k) is losing money?
-
No that's just bad investment choices lol. How'd it do last year?
-
It's with Merrill Lynch.
-
They can still make bad choices. Economy did stall for a bit, but the China trade stuff seems to be calling as we saw by today's big boost. Hopefully it goes back up for ya
-
*cooling
-
Thank you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How are businesses hiring "modestly" if unemployment is at a 17 year low? Do you even use words, bro?
-
It’s “modestly” because 168,000 jobs is 24,000 under the 192,000 they projected, and 31,000 fewer than the average of the 75 months of uninterrupted growth that proceeded it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.