For all you insomnia haters...I bet you call yourselves “good Christians” don’t ya? This is a travesty. These people are still humans, they are here due to no fault of their own. I don’t expect your children to pay for your sins. Why should they pay for what their parents did?
-
-
-
Nope. I call myself an atheist. Granting them amnesty just leads to more illegal immigrants and this exact same problem in a few years. You don't get to stuff the ballot with an infinite number of imported votes.
-
I might change my mind if Mexico reciprocated by opening their border, welfare, free citizenship, and services to us. But until then they have to go back.
-
How about when white folks tear up Cancun, Cozumel, Acapulco?? For spring break? It works both ways. Can't talk shit about immigration when USA doesn't send its finest down there for vacation. Thanks buddy
-
Did those white folk enter the country legally? Did they have their passports and visas in order? Did they leave within the agreed upon time frame? If yes you have no argument whatsoever. The issue is illegal immigrants. Not with legal tourism.
-
If the Mexicans want to come in and visit during spring break they are more than welcome to. If they have their passports in order, and they don't overstay the agreed upon time frame. Tourism is good. Illegal immigration is bad. Don't conflate the two with bad faith arguments.
-
I'm getting dizzy with all this spinning your doing. Let me catch my breathe and I will get back to you.
-
I'd say you just don't have a worthwhile argument. Legal tourism ≠ Illegal immigration
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Next let's rule that they are not eligible to live in America.

-
They should get a chance at some point.
-
After they leave and go through legal process, sure, they should get a chance.
-
Or they can have the option to serve in the military. Which I think is fair.
-
That might be fair if our military was used for something good instead of for evil things like possibly destroying Syria and starting WW3.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Correct ruling
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
makes sense since they are here illegally. finally a judge who understands crime is not to be rewarded
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No shit,
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because they aren't legal residents of that state. Why is this such a difficult concept to digest?
-
For anyone else from another state they can get in state tuition merely by getting a license, set up a residence, and register to vote, all achievable in a single day. Plus "Illegal immigration" is made up by the same people whose ancestors didn't ask permission either.
-
Yes. Your analysis on instate tuition is up to snuff. Your analysis on immigration, however, is not. In the mid to late 15th century, immigration laws didn't exist. You can't break a law if it is not in place. The difference between then and now is the establishment of law.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.