I really would like that statement under oath by the president
-
-
-
About something that may have happened a decade before his presidency? That's just ridiculous. Move on.
-
but he paid and threatened while he was campaigning.
-
Um, because THAT'S when she threatened HIM and demanded payment?
-
That was never said
-
Wait, you're relying on media and not your own logic? Your own thoughts? Well, there's the problem. The MSM tells you only what's part if it's naarative. As you well know. In any case, none of it was illegal, it was consensual.amd she accepted cash and signed an agreement.
-
Except if it’s considered and in kind campaign contribution. Then it is illegal.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
REPORTER: "Does he believe Stormy Daniels was actually attracted to him?"
-
Good one!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Wait. He just said the president doesn’t believe *any* of the claims made by Stormy Daniels. Why was she paid off then? Why the NDA?

-
And the law suit for breaking the nda.
-
Exactly. They can’t even lie properly

-
Alas! There goes ANOTHER press secretary. Wonder if Sarah was getting jealous & told Shah what to say....


-
Wait what, another departure?
-
Just supposition on my part. I was partly joking......
-
It’s only a matter of time

-
Our biggest hope is that this new defence guy quits Asap
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But she passed the lie detector test.....so.........
-
Why do you think lie detector test are irrelevant in court cases? If those test were sure fire proof of right and wrong courts would allow them as evidence.
-
And yet law enforcement at all levels uses it as a part in the interview process for employment.....
-
So you are comparing a job interview with a police Dept where your future depends on it. To a friendly interview with a news organization that will give no push back? That statement alone tells me you know nothing as to why courts don’t allow them as evidence
-
So to that end, I could really care less about Stormy Daniels. It is more problematic that FEC contribution rules appear to have been violated. Just one more example of our President’s contempt for the rule of law.
-
Now that’s funny when has any political figure cared for the law?
-
That does not mean we have to accept that behavior
-
I never said we did but it seems to me that Trump is being judged at a higher level. Hell if everything that was said about trump was true he has more power then god. I’m fatigued with the obsession of trump. .......
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.