Obstruction has to do with intent! Intent has to be proven! If a POTUS did obstruct Justice & is proven, then there are legal ramifications! DT’s Legal Defense team intent is to put doubt in our minds..but no man is above the Law!
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I don't see how there is even an argument here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Apparently, that was only true when Clinton was in office. Jeff Sessions, now Attorney General, seems to feel otherwise, now that the "President" has an 'R' after his name
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The president is not an officer of the law.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Unless your a liberal democrat ie
@BillClintonThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh no! Fake news?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why is this a topic of discussion?! Are we questioning the foundation upon which this county was built on! Come on!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A king is above the law
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, and so can a former President.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“... the _intent_ to corruptly influence...” Mens rea
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Obviously they need to catch up on Scandal
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Absolutely he can & does... every time he opens his mouth.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.