But at what cost?
-
-
-
Cost will include far more deaths, including civilian deaths. Winners? Who profits when we train Afghanis to use more expensive weapons?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not in the long run. Foreign powers never win in that country. Right back thru' history. Leave now
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Extremely doubtful. The country is too similar to Viet Nam. You shore it up. You leave, The Taliban rushes in to fill the void.
-
No way, it's never been the taliban, we have the war with nuke state of Pakistan, taliban are just a tool in this proxy war
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No. These people have been at war for centuries. We don't have the stomach for what they will do...
-
No true, from 1919 when we got our independence from the UK to 1979 communist coup there was no war. Read please before writing.
-
Oh you're right. 70 years of peace so totally different.

-
Also. The point being they are more vested in this than we are, that is all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Afghan air power already enjoys complete supremacy of the air over Afghanistan, one would hope.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, you don't actually know that. Plus Obama inherited a clusterfuck from your boy Dubya, don't forget. What were you expecting him to do?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How much $$$ do you suppose our war profiteers have given him?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These are some of their "confirmed" kills.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.