Tell me again how pipelines are bad for the environment?
While #WarrenBuffett gets more wealthy from the railroads he owns.
Dem #Corruptionpic.twitter.com/ovVDP2Io81
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Tell me again how pipelines are bad for the environment?
While #WarrenBuffett gets more wealthy from the railroads he owns.
Dem #Corruptionpic.twitter.com/ovVDP2Io81
Leaks, stress fractures, welding flaws, loose bolts, ruptures, accidents, pipes not bullet proof or bomb proof nor vandalism proof. Enough?
Underground and safe. You could say all of the above and more about rail traffic. It's primitive by comparison and irrefutably less safe.
Underground is many times more expensive, which is why they don't do this. Trains are still safer
Oh yeah an article written nearly 2 years ago. That's very reliable. NOT!! Science evolves and proves old theories wrong.
But let's continue to roll back regulations.
You know, we *could* switch to renewable energy. Much easier to clean up air when a wind turbine leaks. #smh
The EPA under Trump is totally cool with letting 62 million Trump supporters drink unprotected water.pic.twitter.com/DU606nWXu4
ahahaha No? oh, oh, I see you went to Trump Unoversity, I think you meant know,, get out of here you non-spelling Russian
That's why pipelines are much safer.
This oil can be cleaned from the surface. Pipelines are pressurized up to 1440 psi. So by the time found? Thousands of gallons more.
"No injuries." You know, except the environmental ones.
This reminds me of the time a train crashed and spilled all our wind energy.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.