That's not science. That's "duh."
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What about those who wear no underwear at all
-
I just bought a very small speedo..
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Boy this should give the pro-lifers something to think about. All those potential lives lost just cause men prefer to have a choice on their underwear.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Sorry - i'll do my best to keep some distance from your scrotum in the future.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So those are you saying the "tighty whities" & "Speedos" gots to go ...what's in your pants

pic.twitter.com/YzYV8ZuIBLThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We know that thanks to a Seinfeld episode!




Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this means very little, because my tighty whitey wearing hubby has NO problem with his swimmers. My kids only took 1 "try"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But wat about boxer briefs


Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They need to add men with no underdrawers at all to the study. They can make a baby with just the twinkle in their eye.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i dont own a pair of underwear and i can impregnate a woman from across the room
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would that be because briefs compress the testes against the body, raising temperatures to ones less amenable for sperm, letting the body heat into the testes, compared to boxers that let testes hang further away from the body & its heat, for cooler sperm amenable temperatures?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"controversial?" I didn't know the boxers or briefs debate was so heated. C'mon. Find me two people who vehemently disagree with this study. What a joke.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This peaked my curiosity so I checked and men's briefs didn't become available until the mid 1930's and weren't terribly popular for a while. I wonder if this has anything to do with my doing research of my family tree and realizing my ancestors all had 10-12 kids?
-
Welllllllll...keep in mind they married by 24-25 at the latest and did little in family planning (except that more was better) so their wives would pop out kids every year or two for 15 years. Families like the Duggers prove you can still do that if you are insane enough.
-
Keep in mind part of the reasoning was that they knew that maybe half of their kids wouldn't survive to adulthood. And America was mostly an agricultural country and you needed workers for and to inherit the farmland.
#genealogyisfun -
Your right a lot died young my grandmother had a brother killed working in a sawmill at age 16 but I still wonder if briefs reduces sperm count would they have been as fertile?
-
Sperm count has been going down in the Western world for the past 50 years, actually. There was a study done in the last year or so and they don't know why...could be food, environment, etc.
-
All of the growth hormones we give to our dairy cattle would be a pretty good guess.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.