Lmao. Let's attemp to indict foreign agents we know we'll never get so we look like were doing something.
-
-
-
Attempt to spell correctly
-
Is that truly necessary? Often times if u r on ur phone , letters will be missed ! His point was made!
-
Well his point was also dumb, like you and your parents.
-
Great retort- are you related to Strzok!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What evidence were the indictments based on? I mean, the DNC never allowed their servers be examined, so how do they know it was hacked?
-
Ummmm. All the stuff that was taken off them if kinda proof.
-
Stuff taken off of what?
-
Your right there never were any servers we were all duped my eyes have been opened.
-
Huh? The DNC has servers and claim those servers were hacked, but they have never allowed forensic examination of those servers by any law enforcement/intelligence agencies which means there is no definitive proof they were ever hacked. This is a matter of public record.
-
Are you really living in a world were you think one has to physically examine a price of hardware to see if INFORMATION was stolen? Did you think the Emails were all really good fakes?
-
It's called digital forensic science and it does in fact require the physical presence of the piece of equipment in question to be examined. The DNC never allowed their servers to be examined. What aren't you understanding?
-
If they weren't hacked where did the emails come from?
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
How’s this possible when dnc refuse fbi access to dnc server and fbi never examined the server?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
But...but...I thought it was a witch hunt.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.