CAD97

@CAD97_

College student at . Computer Science and Music. Spends free time on various tasks of varying usefulness. [they/them]

Furman University
Vrijeme pridruživanja: ožujak 2012.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @CAD97_

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @CAD97_

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    15. svi 2019.

    Warning: I've gone mad with power

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    I think the core thesis of our entire argument should be "no, that's just it, we are *so close* to a reasonable society, if only we eliminated this shit that you were lied to about and which makes you miserable too"

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    I don't think we can just turn capitalism off. I also don't think we can fix anything without turning capitalism off. The midpoint is to turn off chunks of it, which we've succeeded at more times than our anger would like us to think.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    We could patch most of the nightmares out of capitalism without even achieving a fully socialist economy and personally I believe in 50 years we'll either have done that or perished. I do not expect or demand better. Humans are tough. We don't *need* a perfect society.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 1. velj
    Tweet je nedostupan.
    Poništi
  6. 29. sij

    - Prosperity is not OSI-compatible (duh) and Pairity "probably" is but not officially - Yay licensing for contributors (fun) - Parts of software under Prosperity and parts under Parity is a thing that is supported and happens in practice - They have Charity but use Blue Oak (?)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 29. sij

    Ok, having read the documentation with a critical eye: - creating a License Zero covered library with a Prosperity dependency requires a private license (ok I guess) - command line tool helps in purchasing licenses for every library in the dependency tree (yay automation) (cont)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 29. sij

    I'm perfectly happy with Apache-2 OR MIT with a "please unionize" note for my Rust library work currently, but I'm also trying to avoid being complacent just giving away all of my work.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  9. 29. sij

    Secondary note: can I "weaponize" by requiring the use of separate components separately licensed under Parity and Prosperity to get separate licensing terms for closed/profit/both?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 29. sij

    I really like the idea/concept behind , but there's one bit that I still don't get: how does it handle the library-library case? Ideally, users of the outer library don't even notice the use of the inner library (from a code perspective, anyway).

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    There are currently three types of video game: 1) you are a special fighting shootboy who shoots things 2) oh I get it, it's a metaphor for depression 3) nintendo

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    24. sij
    Poništi
  13. 23. sij

    Whoops, forgot to say that the lawyer's statement is under oath (or at least as under oath as a defense lawyer is under oath in trial).

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 23. sij

    "random" question: if a lawyer were to state that person X did not commit this crime in that instance, and the fact of whether person X did commit this crime in that instance is under legal debate, and it turns out that person X did, did the lawyer commit perjury?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    21. sij

    Actually, let's change the puzzle to this. You may otherwise accidentally guess it correctly, but not this one.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. ruj 2018.
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    So in school you learn the incomplete Bernoulli answer to why planes fly. It made sense, I had no intuition for the scale of it so I accepted it. Later I learned the full Coanda effect explanation. Planes fly because the air is ... sticky? I no longer believe planes fly.

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    18. sij

    Google claims that the new format "puts a site’s brand front & center". But if that was the rationale... ...wouldn't it ALSO make sense to do the same for adverts too – who are paying money specifically for brand awareness? 🤔

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    20. sij

    The ADHD trait of "a million projects" is actually an adaptive strategy for brains that very specifically can't do what they set out to. By working "sideways" on many things, you get a *lot* done—while feeling like you "never do anything" (i.e., what you're "supposed" to do). 1/

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 21. sij
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    19. sij

    i want to be a big deal on twitter. *tweets some good tweets*

    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij

    sorry folks rewriting in rust is inevitable

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·