Look back to the beginning. Speculative question to clinicians about 21 errors we know no details of. I only answered to point that out.
-
-
Replying to @NHSwhistleblowr @sarasiobhan and
It is speculative. Im amazed in all of this debate about the correctness of decision to convict and strike off nobody has actually known what the 21 errors were and how serious - individually or cumulatively- they are. Aren’t they listed somewhere?Some (not all) are in judgments
3 replies 3 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @KirstenSjovoll @Imonlyslightly and
I am amazed that the medical profession is up in arms over this conviction and no one even knows he mistakes. It is as likely that they were really bad as they were minor if no one knows in fact based on the conviction it is more likely they were serious errors.
4 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @Allyncondon @KirstenSjovoll and
The 2 things medics (apart from
@gmc and@MPS_Medical statements) are really concerned about are the system issues (which may or may not mean doctor got to point she was bound to fail) and the lack of input from consultant.....3 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Replying to @marktaylor18 @Allyncondon and
Both of these should unite us all. The accounts of medical harm related on here routinely reflect these concerns. Consultants not reviewing sick children, even when families are almost fighting for such reviews, systems not learning from previous deaths.....
3 replies 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @marktaylor18 @Allyncondon and
When we can get a sense of why a jury thought Dr BG was 'truly exceptionally bad' and why doctors 'just don't think she could have been, it must have been the system,' then maybe we will have a starting place. For now, we have a jigsaw with edges and no middle.
3 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @katemasters67 @marktaylor18 and
We do not think "she didn't make errors, so it must be the system" That is wrong We know the system was a bloody mess - Trust admitted it and changed it but their report was blocked from court I would screw up doing 4 jobs with no labs + x-ray problems, so how could she not?
3 replies 5 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @GrumpyOldDoc @katemasters67 and
How can we demand/expect openness, candour and accountability from frontline staff when the people above them (DoHSC etc) don’t give it-.. These NHS Staff Were Told The Swine Flu Vaccine Was Safe, And They're Suffering The Consequences https://www.buzzfeed.com/shaunlintern/these-nhs-staff-were-told-the-swine-flu-vaccine-was-safe?utm_term=.beqWpN9Jw … via
@ShaunLintern1 reply 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @marktaylor18 @GrumpyOldDoc and
I was wondering how this all fits with argument for
#humanfactors#systemsfailures or was this someone’s ‘fault’ so right to claim compensation? If so why? BTW asking out of academic interest, to help understand humanfactor arguments, agree staff right to seek compensation here.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @4AdsthePoet @GrumpyOldDoc and
This is purely a comment about candour. No-one is admitting something has gone wrong and defending the use of the untested vaccines. Staff were made to feel they were bad people if didn’t have vaccine, pressured and bullied
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Purely about candour? When that lack of candour includes failure to disclose pertinent facts surrounding safety, then it's about consent too, for me. Add in coercion (pressured/bullied) potentially invalidating any consent and this could even have criminal implications, imho.
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY @marktaylor18 and
Omission can be very misleading & where there is no doubt that omission should not have been made because it would have been obvious to person, org, that it would mislead it should be dealt with & learning shared to improve culture.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.