That's why, when something goes wrong and I'm not there I should apologise. When they say it isn't my fault, I reply, "no, it isn't, but I am responsible for the care that happens in my name, and if we have fallen short, then it is my job to fix it, and not let it happen again"
-
-
I'll follow my MPs when they agree to observe one too and work out to legally introduce and enforce one for us both
-
Funny you should say that; a few years back
@willcpowell and I used to speculate that might be the reason it has been persistently resisted for doctors - in case somebody then decided it might be a good idea for MPs too. All the more reason to try from my seat, if so. -
It's legally unenforceable. Proving who knew what and when. Read NI Hyponatraemia enquiry for an example of how after 14 years of investigation no one is still sure of exactly what happened in at least one of the cases
-
I think that serious questions need to be asked about Trust legal teams.
-
Oh, me too!!
-
Or just as much questions about boards which hide behind legal team. "We were just acting on the legal advice."
#coalitionofevil -
Has failure of duty of candour ever been tested in courts? Trusts and medics are supposed to help courts reach the correct conclusion.... but it's clear that that's a standard that's rarely met.
-
As with reg 5
@CareQualityComm can take regulatory action other than prosecution. Personal experience is that even when you report a breach no proper investigation. And no discussion. - 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There R 3 problems/errors in this paragraph from his final clinic letter alone.Most obvious is that WD heterozygotes are not known to have eye changes.Wouldn’t share this but he refused to acknowledge his mistakes or accept WD experts’ advice. He's a risk to me.+should be honestpic.twitter.com/1IHZ641tUe
-
+how much learning has been lost in improving services because he would not admit errors/problems caused; & because he was allowed to do that? Just in case anyone is misled by his comments this is what a world expert wrote after he read the clinic letter.He may have been in shockpic.twitter.com/9pXBmozLJX
-
Ha! He obviously felt it worthy of repeating. I understand completely. I'm not even going to start sharing my own list of examples - we'd be back to that multi-tweet conversation again. But a glance at my pinned tweet will give you a taste.
-
I have gathered together quite a collection of 'conflicting extracts' from medical records/correspondence. Too many to share. Will take a look at your Tweet.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.