...the assessment of gross, and therefore the definition of the crime itself is also left to the jurors, which seems wrong. But the idea that a balanced assessment of individual culpability is properly explored against the systemic culpability is wrong...
-
-
The medical world has built its own safety net into the law (perhaps explaining why there are so few prosecutions) and even that couldn’t save her. >
-
We don’t know what the mystery ‘2 systems issues’ were that the judge deemed inadmissible because of their irrelevance. We don’t know what other systems issues WERE raised in court.
-
We don’t even know the full details of her errors. 21 or otherwise. And we certainly don’t know enough at this stage to assert that the law needs changing, imho. END Over to you... :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Disagree. Not least because of the positive evidence we DO have on the unsafe corporate systemic environment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.