Primacy of system analysis in unbiased exploratory independent investigation must be a requisite if there is a vague whiff of a significant system influence as a contextual backdrop.
-
-
Replying to @DrJimboNHS @nickargall and
It seems perverse to me that the actual nature of the crime is defined by jurors because they decide what is gross. That is especially perverse if accede to the argument of the inherent complexities of medicine and surrounding systems, which I do.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrJimboNHS @C7RKY and
Fair. The question of how non-professionals can assess professional negligence is definitely a problem. The inevitable reliance on expert witnesses means that in all but the most clear-cut cases, the most persuasive expert will decide the matter.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nickargall @C7RKY and
Yes. And we all know how unfit for purpose medical expert systems have been eg vis a vis shaken baby syndrome. Again exploratory rather than adversarialism is probably better here.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @DrJimboNHS @C7RKY and
Exploratory is definitely best for fixing systems. But it’s unrealistic to rule out the adversarial option. A tiny number of professionals are genuinely criminal. An option to sanction those people must exist.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @nickargall @C7RKY and
We already have some infrastructure to do this in inquests/FAI. We must just make it primary and complete it and charge the investigation with exploration of system issues. Then make the first test of the court whether asymmetric individual liability exists.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DrJimboNHS @nickargall and
Sorry... FAI? I'm trying to understand where you think what Nick described as 'genuinely criminal' behaviour should be dealt with.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @C7RKY @nickargall and
Read my tweet. I said unbiased exploration of all issues in an inquest/FAI required before criminal court to charge the criminal court with the context to determine the extent of individual liability as a basic test in GNM.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DrJimboNHS @nickargall and
'Read my tweet'? You really aren't getting the message from all the feedback about your aggressive tone on here, are you Jamie? I don't know what FAI is - that's why I was asking. But don't worry... I'll find out for myself thanks.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @nickargall and
Actually your tweet came across very aggressively.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It did? Then it's perhaps time I took a break. Because that was the last thing on my mind.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.