To be honest, I have less problem with what the tribunal has done here than what the CPS, court and then subsequently the GMC have.
-
-
That’s it. It looks bad. It feels tragic that our peculiar style of speech is undermining staff-family links on here. From another view, lapsing into the same speech style used with colleagues, might even be a good sign. Reminds me a bit of the to-swear-or-not-to-swear debate.
-
Actually indicative of respect and true engagement? Yes. Worrying that it’s also indicative of an abrasive culture where highly personalised remarks are ok?
-
That's an interesting observation. For people like me, it's an occasional glimpse at the true culture and what passes for 'normal'. Reminds me of the old phrase: 'Nothing I'm not used to. But it's amazing what you can get used to.'
-
Medical rudeness costs lives. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/136/3/487 … Yet I suspect what counts as rudeness varies in different settings. The “plain speaking” on a building site would be verbal abuse in some offices.
-
Interesting study - thanks. Extends way beyond rudeness of course. All kinds of unusual behaviours can become the norm in any isolated environment.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.