My biggest problem in all this is preventing anything like this happening to another Jack by learning the right lessons and taking the evidence from around the world about what works in ensuring the highest of safety standards for all patients, no matter what their background.
Indeed. And I'm pointing out the equally speculative nature of his reply. We need that transcript!
-
-
Kate’s speculation is an established fact! We only need the transcript if we are attempting a complete retrial. We can identify and discuss general issues without needing to reach a verdict on any particular case.
-
If attempts should emerge to try and change something about the law as a result of this case, then I do think we need the transcript. Retrial or not.
-
I don’t think there’s any need to change the law. BG’s defense relied on human factors, but awareness of human factors science remains poor.
-
I agree entirely. Now let's see what comes from Hunt's review and hope it reflects that stance.
-
Haha! Like finding yourself unexpectedly locked in a sweetshop overnight ;)
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.