And if it wasn't provided that would have counted against her. Which is what trainees were concerned about, damned if they do, damned if they don't
-
-
No. Those are irrelevant to the asymmetry of the conviction given the available positive evidence.
-
Really? And you know that how?
-
Because of the ridiculous position a trainee was put in in terms of unsafe staffing and the corporate culpability in unsafe drug policy. Irrespective of the number of mistakes Bawa-Garba made, those things represent a huge corporate failure.
-
We are in total agreement on the need for provision of safe services.
#SafeStaffing being chief among them. But it's still possible to behave in a grossly negligent manner despite the environment. We need to know more detail, imho.https://twitter.com/c7rky/status/956631900562624513 …
-
I'm not disputing that. I originally didnt object to the conviction, certainly not to the principle of that potential, but I did object to the asymmetry. However from what I now know about how intention/levels of responsibility are dealt with, I think GNM law needs sign. reform.
-
What is the nature of the reform you want to see?
-
The duty of care is shared not individual. The system should replace the individual in tests 1/2. A fifth test, that the breach is attributable to an/the individual. That what is gross is better defined, contextual definitions, rather than criminality being defined by jurors.
-
Primacy of system analysis in unbiased exploratory independent investigation must be a requisite if there is a vague whiff of a significant system influence as a contextual backdrop.
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
But that wasn't our conversation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.