Yes, and she did, and she wrote up a correct prescription list, deliberately omitting Enalapril.
-
-
The idea that is new is wrong. The us & them is divisive, wrong & insulting to whistleblowers who have lost careers over putting patients first and those of us who have supported them. The vast majority of us do medicine precisely because we have care for patients.
-
Steady on there Jamie. I'm aware that whistleblowers get the worst of both worlds in this. I simply meant it's unusual to see the entire doctor population getting openly played in this way.https://twitter.com/c7rky/status/948529655597948930 …
-
Any of us, trying to secure little pieces of progress in the system, political battles for our patients, are quite used to such political economies with facts, and intentions. It's unusual for the politics to be so open and embarrassing for those concerned.
-
Isn't it just...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Certainly, statements by lawyers for either side need to be examined with a microscope, whereas for statements by the judge, I think a magnifying glass will do. And I guess I should recognize that I’ve been more specific in my criticism of the process than many.
-
‘Missing category of evidence’ is a simpler claim than some of the other claims that seek to interpret what happened. While I do have an opinion on one of the medical expert witnesses, it’s not a defensible opinion, so I withheld it. Some were less restrained.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
For years we’ve seen this sort of treatment dished out to whistleblowers, patients and bereaved families. Until recently, most doctors assumed victims were describing misunderstandings, exaggerations, or individual malice. I think the contract dispute opened some eyes.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.