Yes, and she did, and she wrote up a correct prescription list, deliberately omitting Enalapril.
-
-
Numerous failings made up the 'exceptionally bad' care. Now reflections are off the medics' high table of assumptions it's back to 'mum did it'. Will it ever end?
-
Reflections have not off the table. Interestingly the
@gmcuk And@MPS_Medical will have been telling the truth when say e-portfolio wasn’t used. Jack’s death was when paper portfolios were used. This was document that locum sent in to CPS See letter here.https://twitter.com/hwganendodoc/status/962015781469921280 … -
I would say somewhat economical with the truth about reflections seems more apt. Afterall, the issue is that of how reflections (written or verbal) are used, not just how a particular form of reflection was used, as selected by whoever.
-
a little bit like an episode of "Yes Minister"
-
It's odd to see doctors on the receiving end of it, but these weasel-worded lawyer games have an all too familiar feel to me. See what I mean now,
@nickargall? -
The idea that is new is wrong. The us & them is divisive, wrong & insulting to whistleblowers who have lost careers over putting patients first and those of us who have supported them. The vast majority of us do medicine precisely because we have care for patients.
-
Steady on there Jamie. I'm aware that whistleblowers get the worst of both worlds in this. I simply meant it's unusual to see the entire doctor population getting openly played in this way.https://twitter.com/c7rky/status/948529655597948930 …
-
Any of us, trying to secure little pieces of progress in the system, political battles for our patients, are quite used to such political economies with facts, and intentions. It's unusual for the politics to be so open and embarrassing for those concerned.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
She'd worked on neonates and community paeds, not general paeds or admissions in that hospital. Neonates is nothing like general paeds, and community paeds is, well, community. But in any case, the practice that David describes is broadly the practice across the UK.
-
So what was the drug policy in neonates at that hospital when she worked there? Was it different to the policy for general paeds or admissions? Key question for me is; what was she used to? And therefore what was she expecting to be in place? Not just what should it have been.
-
Neonates (tries not to sound facetious here but will fail) couldnt have such a policy, as baby doesnt arrive with medicines from the community
-
Sorry, I really didn't think that through, did I? That's the problem with poking your nose into areas of medicine you haven't personally looked into. I'll get my coat...pic.twitter.com/1WzAaALSrF
-
Smiles. To be honest I was looking at your post for a while, thinking "something is wrong here" before penny dropped. It isn't always obvious
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No John No What happened at LRI was a unique and frankly bizarre policy. There was absolutely nothing common about it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.