We had criminal and civil cases. The criminal judge's thinking was that if anyone is responsible for reducing someone's life even by a minute they must be held to account. in this case that was the driver of the car who never deviated from taking responsibility for the accident
I think I told you a while back Kate... this is a vile game to some and there are no depths to which they will not stoop if it helps save face. Hospital Trust became an oxymoron for me some time back. It's not at all l what I expected to encounter.
-
-
Plus, by writing that on public social media; you are practically guaranteeing that if you need future social healthcare, that your care would be vindictive, of poor quality. That if there’s a bed, choice between you and a less-ill favoured patient, that you’ll be denied help.
-
I know it sounds counter-intuitive, but I'd say the quality of care my family has received improved since our experience. Who knew having cause to learn the laws surrounding medical consent would prove to be so universally helpful? :)
-
That sounds awesome, hopeful. Maybe you are in a more-open community? I'm in a university town, Cambridge, where university and hospital are inter-linked.. And medical profesisonals serve private and social healthcare across the region, limiting options. London is good though.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I understand. But it’s not what I want to hear; I want to be told that NHS is safe. That people experiencing unanticipated medical outcomes will get exactly the same quality of care as any other person if needing future social care. The opposite is too terrifying to consider.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.