-
-
it's not a case review but a broader look at the issue I think. Hence wanting to see the TOR. I feel very nervy about potential outcomes. Candour at the point of harm would be a great point to look at to see why manslaughter is considered and other factors might have been lost
-
Thanks for sharing. Thinking out loud: personally, I’d see candour as a reason for not prosecuting, where an oversight or unanticipated medical outcome resulted from multiple system failures? I’m all for acknowledging oversights, correcting where possible; where patient alive.
-
Candour is a powerful thing. Most people can accept "we messed up. We let you down. We are sorry and this is what we are going to do..."
-
Agree, it is the ‘we did nothing wrong, if we did it was your fault, we are not going to apologise, medics and nurses are God’s & angels & any one questioning them is mad, bad or sad & probably all three’ approach that leads to litigation.
-
Abusive and vexatious. The only 2 things mentioned in the NHS constitution which permit them to refuse access to services. Including not replying to correspondence. Is it any wonder they're so keen to affix the label to awkward complainants? The 'mad' label is the back-up plan.
-
Yes - in Scotland a health board was routinely labelling the gentlest of parents of disabled
#CYP abusive. It turned out they did it if a parent talked about their child having ‘rights’. -
That’s terrifying.
-
That's reality.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Appointing a medic to lead the investigation is not a good start.
-
Far from it. Well the child sex abuse inquiry went through a few chairs once people started looking more closely. Let's see where this goes...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agree.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.