When we first heard that there was to be no trial, and an internal investigation, we felt awful for the Adcocks- while hoping that the investigation would find the systemic flaws and improve things. Then comes the criminal case.
-
-
That is where we all struggle. For the public, a secret society with secret rituals took Jack into their care and he died, when he shouldn’t have. For healthcare, a young boy presented with a life threatening infection with a high mortality and died.
-
Bear in mind it's only secret if you refuse to tell us! Maybe there's a reason a 2nd recommendation for a statutory duty of candour has now been put forward since Francis? It's clearly part of the problem. Families just want honesty to be part of wherever this is going next.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I agree, it is the way legitimate concerns are addressed or rather not addressed which leads to litigation both civil and criminal.
-
What else are we left with? I didn't feel I had any choice, once the cover up became so outrageously blatant.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Both sides are desperate to hold someone or something responsible, as we both grieve Jack’s loss. We can’t put Group A Streptococcus and Sepsis algorithms on trial, sadly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.