Its called Scapegoating!
-
-
Yes I wrote that It is the logical implication of the
#DavidSellu#HoneyRose#BawaGarba#IsabelAmaro cases Yesterday the Academy of Royal Colleges and Postgraduate Deans (far more powerful than me) told Junior Doctors to anonymise their reflections on events around deaths -
Well then allow me to retort, if you're going to be so unremorseful. Cover ups will not start immediately, as they have been going on for generations. The duty of candour is a crock anyway and your threats are hollow, as they are merely a threat to continue what is already done.
-
Untrue.
-
True.
-
Those of us who have always insisted on candour, truth and open discussion are now having second thoughts, and wondering why bother any more if we will be made scapegoats and nothing will change in the broken system. Liars always stay liars, they won't change.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes I wrote that. Exactly why I was so voiciferous about
#DavidSellu and#BawaGarba Fear is now rife amongst Junior & Senuor Doctors because they know whatever the circumstances there is now no reason for harmful error other than criminal negligence@djbeckettThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is what I said would happen if doctors with exemplary records (
#DavidSellu is a far better Clinician than me) are sacrificed and made out to be criminals. We said 'There but for the Grace of God, go I' but there is no Grace now -
John I am absolutely not advocating this turn a blind eye approach but it will be an ordinary human sometimes subconscious response to
@gmcuk action in High Court against#BawaGarba Why else is@Jeremy_Hunt so flustered? -
Because I am leaving
@westernsussex I handed over reflections on over 300 deaths under my care. I was always open in my reflections, but I FEEL a whole lot more insecure this week than last after#BawaGarba &@gmcuk High Court action@djnicholl@DacreJane@TheIHI@profchrisham -
Why? Are you planning on being grossly negligent any time soon then? Because that was her crime, Gordon and her reflections were only brought in by the defence & stopped by the judge anyway. So what's your excuse? And here's my earlier tweet which got losthttps://twitter.com/c7rky/status/959141110479286272 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A Junior spent 1h talking through a case today and then entered in Portfolio 'Case discussed with Educational Supervisor' because of advice yesterday from Academy & Dean. Now the organisation can learn nothing from the case because No Evidence
@djbeckett@vaughan_jenny@TheIHIThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is a real concern Be open and honest = made a scapegoat Today meeting Trust QC he asked me something I didn't know - so I went back to labs + found an error that only I saw + that will affect case He now knows Staying quiet would have been so much easier Some will now
-
Who has the power to do this scapegoating, if it also applies to you as a consultant? And how do we take it back from them? Docs have showed this week you have enormous strength in numbers, so why has that power not been utilised to stop the practice, instead of threaten candour?
-
Doctors aren’t in charge. They are responsible but not in charge...
-
But what do they all do when somebody is being scapegoated? Stay silent and cover their own backs? There's plenty of you speaking out now and it's making a difference on a much bigger stage.
-
That’s like asking what people in any workplace do over insidious bullying. The NHS employs some very clever people. Who can say or do all sorts of things and dress it up as reasonable
-
Some of the "insidious bullies" use position power just to keep people down. They are as thick as thieves. You only have to look at baby P to see exactly how the NHS works to close down those who dare speak out.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.