Well first off her reflective practice was not used against her at any stage and my understanding is that it was not her first day back at work. These are two of the areas that medics appear to be ramming down people’s throats. Not quite sure why. #nottrue
-
-
Replying to @Allyncondon @Gitabananas and
Does it matter? Neither Court or GMC were really interested in detail. http://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/2018/01/30/to-err-is-homicide-in-britain-the-case-of-dr-hadiza-bawa-garba/ …
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @RodMack2 @Gitabananas and
I think it does matter if 1000s of Doctors are using it to fabricate an unnecessary situation that is disrespectful to Jacks family. Yes I do think it matters. It mattered when Doctors thought it was true so yes it matters now it’s not.
4 replies 3 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Allyncondon @Gitabananas and
I don't think 1000s of doctors are fabricating anything. Neither do I think they are being disrespectful to a bereaved family. Access to portfolios isn't the point. It's that individual error in a unsafe system can be so readily attributed solely to an individual.
3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @RodMack2 @Allyncondon and
Yes, it's an unsafe system that needs fixing Rod and the police investigation may take that point further now. But this isn't mere individual error - that would just be a clin neg case - this is gross negligence to such a degree, that it was individually criminal. V different.
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @Allyncondon and
Respect your opinion but don’t agree. No reckless or wilful violation of policy or procedure. I can’t see a criminal act. IMHO.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RodMack2 @Allyncondon and
With respect Rod, you're elevating your own opinion of events above that of the high court there, without even the benefit of an original transcript to know the facts. What makes you feel able to do that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @Allyncondon and
Being human, being interested in human factors and patient safety, 20+ years of working in under-resourced settings .. off top of head. Judges, being human, make mistakes too ... IMHO ...https://thesecretbarrister.com/
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RodMack2 @Allyncondon and
Right now, this debate has become polarised and as much about pushing a preferred message as the facts. I would advise caution - yesterday proved the medical side of this divide can get very fundamental facts wrong. We don't know what we don't know.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @Gitabananas and
Portfolio issue is a distraction IMHO. I’m not pushing a message. Just expressing a view and raising awareness of the underpinning issues raised by this sad case. The level of risk we are expected to manage is very high.pic.twitter.com/4g9nv2hbcm
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
Managing high levels of risk does rather come with the white coat, but we all accept #safestaffing levels got ducked & it's now unreasonable. No argument. But even in that environment, there are behaviours which can be deemed grossly negligent. Who knows?https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/957005084990345217 …
John Clarke added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.