Myself and @ClinicalHF colleagues have been working behind the scenes over the past few days on the implications of the #BawaGarba ruling. This has included meetings with significant organisations and individuals, and will continue.
-
-
Respect your opinion but don’t agree. No reckless or wilful violation of policy or procedure. I can’t see a criminal act. IMHO.
-
With respect Rod, you're elevating your own opinion of events above that of the high court there, without even the benefit of an original transcript to know the facts. What makes you feel able to do that?
-
Being human, being interested in human factors and patient safety, 20+ years of working in under-resourced settings .. off top of head. Judges, being human, make mistakes too ... IMHO ...https://thesecretbarrister.com/
-
Right now, this debate has become polarised and as much about pushing a preferred message as the facts. I would advise caution - yesterday proved the medical side of this divide can get very fundamental facts wrong. We don't know what we don't know.
-
Portfolio issue is a distraction IMHO. I’m not pushing a message. Just expressing a view and raising awareness of the underpinning issues raised by this sad case. The level of risk we are expected to manage is very high.pic.twitter.com/4g9nv2hbcm
-
Managing high levels of risk does rather come with the white coat, but we all accept
#safestaffing levels got ducked & it's now unreasonable. No argument. But even in that environment, there are behaviours which can be deemed grossly negligent. Who knows?https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/957005084990345217 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.