>> Compare this tweet and the next : It did so as a result of considering (the systemic failings or failings of others and personal mitigation which had already been considered by the jury) Emphasised this way, you might assume the jury considered all 3 of the items listed. >>
-
-
Show this thread
-
>> It did so as a result of considering the systemic failings or failings of others (and personal mitigation which had already been considered by the jury) Wheras, emphasised this way, you might instead assume the jury only got to consider personal mitigation. So which is it?
Show this thread -
"There were two "systemic" failings not explored at trial" ...but no way of knowing what they specifically were? Hmmm. "Failings of the severity found by the jury here is not diminished by a failure in the safety net.." ...seems to be the means of achieving separation? Curious.pic.twitter.com/EA74NspVIV
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.