Tick - but everyone who looks at it, sees the same problem: reaching an effective solution, is much more difficult, based on 'the problem continuing to exist'.https://twitter.com/C7RKY/status/953994774834483200 …
-
-
Replying to @MikeStone2_EoL
It needs an amnesty, or some such watershed moment. I fear the true picture of harm & avoidable deaths is likely much worse than the controlled glimpse we are permitted currently. Even an amnesty may hold too much fear for some. Fear of public reaction to the true picture.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
'avoidable deaths' is a complex concept, hidden behind an apparently clear term: mind you, 'shared decision making' is much worse http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g4855/rr/761712 … See also http://www.bmj.com/content/355/bmj.i6165/rr …pic.twitter.com/atTXH62H2P
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @MikeStone2_EoL
The one clear thing about the phrase 'shared decision making' for me, is how clearly wrong it is. The ONLY one making this decision will be me, as a pt with capacity. And the only thing being shared will be the information the clinician is providing to help me decide.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY
See also my piece https://www.dignityincare.org.uk/Discuss-and-debate/Dignity-Champions-forum/My-reasons-are-my-own-it-is-entirely-up-to-me-whether-or-not-I-decide-to-share-them/870/ … The thing is - the MCA clearly says one thing [and it is a LAW] - but doctors persist in writing something else entirely!
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
I'm not as familiar with the MCA as you - it wasn't a factor I had to account for - but other than that, this reads like something I might have written. I'm strongly in agreement with you. Particularly on there being no pt obligation to explain their decision.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.