I would agree. Although it won't protect all, it should protect most. Problem is, the only time CQC have ever checked & recorded data, they found the trust had retained the pt's copy in 85% of forms inspected. (Pause for effect) They've not recorded any further such data since.
-
-
The royal college guidance is the most up to date (Current GMC and DOH guidance dates back to 2008 and 2009). I guess all guidance is should
-
Is whichever is most up to date the only determining factor? GMC are reviewing their guidelines now (a bit late - that letter above is dated Oct 2014!) but will the torch then just be passed to GMC as the most definitive, when it becomes the latest?https://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/news_consultation/30001.asp …
-
I suppose it depends on the context. The RCS guidance interpreted the GMC guidance and is more up to date and practical
-
ZHH You know my view, Mark; one authoritative source, pls, NHS, etc etc etc
-
I'm inclined to agree, Ken. If for no other reason than to maximise learning. E.g. Would
@RCSnews have been aware of this jointly signed letter that GMC received on the subject from CQC & NHSE in 2014, when reviewing their own guidance? I don't know.pic.twitter.com/dG7KJA0QvH
-
ZHH Not sure it's "learning", John; "This is what everyone will do". In safety-critical sectors lots has to be mandated
-
Learning what needs to be mandated is still learning. But I like your thinking. :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.