Well, 24-48 hours compared to 48 - 96 hours: exactly the same argument, about 'patient accepts the risk to gain the relief'.
-
-
1/2 Clearly drugs should be 'titrated against pain'. So you start with a low dose. The issue, for known end-of-life, hinges on whether you stop titrating against pain because the increased dose necessary to remove the pain might also shorten life: in my view the increased dose
-
2/2 necessary to remove the patient's pain, is still legally okay PROVIDED the patient has requested the administration of the drug and has given informed consent.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
depends on the condition, but with the right care...only 7% cannot be helped by modern pain management. The issue with the LCP is people deliberately put to death when they could have lived pain-free lives but cost the state a pension. c
@ang__johnson@ashkarmstrong@briangukc -
Exactly, it's easy for these drs to write such a report. I mean what did they do ....bring them back to life and ask them if they felt any pain
#sarcastic? Allegedly many who were pulled off eol and went on to live said they had extreme thirst and were in pain due to EOLC tacticspic.twitter.com/RJbB3EMjXR
-
I don't like 'death by dehydration' if that is painful: which is why I support attempts to legalise medically-assisted suicide - but it MUST BE suicide (the PATIENT must be the decision-maker). Anyway - LCP not always 'fatal', then (I've previously tweeted about that).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.