I have to say I have not hesitated in the historic past to record mtgs with ppl I had previously had problems with. The fact that one of them asked if I was recording before she wld start the mtg made me even more determined. She thought she cld get away w/behaving badly
-
-
Replying to @jmcefalas @C7RKY and
I have insisted on having full recordings or witnesses for meetings with families who I know full well have made all manner of allegations against various (nice, decent) colleagues. It makes sense and so long as they consent to recording - why not?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mancunianmedic @jmcefalas and
In the context of a complaints meeting i think it is reasonable but personally i dont think audio or video recordings of patients private data should be compulsory and I think there are different issues to patients recording their own consultations for personal/domestic purposes
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @m4delen @mancunianmedic and
No, not compulsory, but rather available should everyone consent.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IamBonglie @m4delen and
John Clarke Retweeted John Clarke
Everyone doesn't have to consent, strictly speaking. Only the patient. David & I touched on this before:https://twitter.com/c7rky/status/948740907368632320 …
John Clarke added,
John Clarke @C7RKYReplying to @mancunianmedic @MsPottingShed and 25 othersWhat's courteous and what's legal may vary here. Although I can't help mention that the point you make re one party editing for their own ends without the other being able to guard against it, is exactly the position every patient currently faces with traditional medical records.2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
-
Replying to @jmcefalas @IamBonglie and
I agree. Though I confess I probably more inform as a courtesy, than ask. Because I have no intention of not recording if I'm honest.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C7RKY @jmcefalas and
I've informed managers and told them its up to them to pass it on & have the conversation with staff working with me as I've had enough of my appointments messed up by professionals saying they wont continue until theyve checked with information governance (20yrs its been law!)
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @m4delen @jmcefalas and
Really? Do you know, Ive never had a problem. Biggest objection I encountered was a pulled face. I don't hide it and I have to say, the quality of consultations improved dramatically, as a side-benefit too. :)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Depends how you frame it I suspect. If framed as an aide memoire, suspect few will demur; if as a tool to nail them to the wall, all will.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Like it or not though, this would be an accurate reflection of reality. Given the number of horrendous cover up stories I've heard, I do wonder if everybody is quite ready to deal with the potential fallout from that reality.
-
-
Replying to @C7RKY @IamBonglie and
I favour prevention in all things. Easier in this case than cure. You can’t put the genie back in the bottle but accountability can keep it stoppered up, at least face to face
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jmcefalas @IamBonglie and
I do agree. Prevention of poor care & misunderstanding being the goal. Rather than the current version - prevention of reputational damage at all costs, including covering up. But if recording consultations exposes that latter one, it could be a whole other genie - sans stopper.
0 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.