They are fearful.
I agree. Though I confess I probably more inform as a courtesy, than ask. Because I have no intention of not recording if I'm honest.
-
-
I've informed managers and told them its up to them to pass it on & have the conversation with staff working with me as I've had enough of my appointments messed up by professionals saying they wont continue until theyve checked with information governance (20yrs its been law!)
-
Really? Do you know, Ive never had a problem. Biggest objection I encountered was a pulled face. I don't hide it and I have to say, the quality of consultations improved dramatically, as a side-benefit too. :)
-
Depends how you frame it I suspect. If framed as an aide memoire, suspect few will demur; if as a tool to nail them to the wall, all will.
-
Like it or not though, this would be an accurate reflection of reality. Given the number of horrendous cover up stories I've heard, I do wonder if everybody is quite ready to deal with the potential fallout from that reality.
-
I favour prevention in all things. Easier in this case than cure. You can’t put the genie back in the bottle but accountability can keep it stoppered up, at least face to face
-
I do agree. Prevention of poor care & misunderstanding being the goal. Rather than the current version - prevention of reputational damage at all costs, including covering up. But if recording consultations exposes that latter one, it could be a whole other genie - sans stopper.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.