Good call, imho.https://twitter.com/c7rky/status/946346073915822080 …
-
-
I do not understand why at the end of every consultation a copy of it doesn’t go into the notes & a copy to patient. Protects everybody.
-
I sense a growing support for that idea on both sides. Currently, medical records are at the heart of what is deemed to be the truth. But when one side only holds them, that 'truth' has a horribly frequent habit of changing. I already record every one, so I'm in!
-
Many communication issues would be resolved, IMO, if people had the opportunity to play what was said, rather than rely on the recollection of what they felt.
-
100% with you. I started recording for accuracy of records tbh, but I quickly realised how valuable it was to be able to listen back to consultations after the event. It's a lot less work than taking extensive contemporaneous notes & harder to dispute. Protects all parties.
-
I truly do not understand the defensiveness. It's a straight record. Objecting raises a whole raft of questions that are more damaging than the actual recording!
-
A lot of professionals are totally paranoid that we will edit recordings or play them out of context, publish them & mistrepresent causing damage to their reputations. Overestimates my technical skill & assumes pts are dishonest & will break law
-
They are fearful.
-
of what? Either they have the conviction of their competence or they don't. The world is not full of nasty patients seeking to destroy professionals for goodness sake. It's in everyone's interests to have an open and shared record.
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Can’t remember now it was 3 years ago!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.