It can be really interesting when involved in longer threads on a given topic. You can literally watch people's confirmation bias in action, as they work their way down the thread, picking out the tweets that make them feel good about their own viewpoint for RTs/Favs. No debate.
Never rule out the musical.. let's see how the book goes first!
If that document is anything to go by, I'm sure it'll be a real page-turner.
And I think you were hoping to copy in @CommonsPACAC to your previous tweet. So that's that done. :)
-
-
Transcript recent PACAC PHSO scrutiny. When u hve time, plse look at ref to our case Q 64-70 http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/public-administration-and-constitutional-affairs-committee/parliamentary-and-health-service-ombudsman-scrutiny-201617/oral/75668.pdf …
-
Approaching 3 years since PHSO declared their own report to be flawed, attending PACAC with full knowledge that your evidence would be part of the discussion & they could barely tell the committee how reports are quashed, let alone actually doing it? What is this utter nonsense?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.