As clinician, you don’t need to prove the factuality of a statement about me before you enter it. It will be then treated as fact - even if it’s subjective or tentative (or even not true). As Pt I have to fight for years to remove untruths. Because they’re you’re records
-
-
ZHH I think very many patients + loved ones will be surprised by this
@ianmsyme Needs a radical update -
Indeed it does. These may also interest you Ken. They are the 2 written parliamentary questions which Charlotte Leslie submitted to DoH after meeting with me. http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2014-07-15/205948/ … And... http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2014-07-16/206241/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It is not specifically a conversation although that is usually part of the consent process. Important thing is that patients are informed.
-
And (obviously) agree
-
Ha! Glad you added the clarity - sounds a lot less sinister that way. :) It really is the conversation that counts tho. Not only as it's the most likely means of informing the pt, but also because it's the only obvious way to confirm the pt has understood for consent to be valid
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
ZHH Tks, John
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.